= Haswell AVX2 Performance Test = == Summary == In 2013, Intel introduced the 'Haswell' chip architecture, which included silicon to improve performance via new 256-bit-wide instructions: * [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#Advanced_Vector_Extensions_2|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#Advanced_Vector_Extensions_2]] * [[https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-intel-avx2-improves-performance-on-server-applications|https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-intel-avx2-improves-performance-on-server-applications]] At the Martinos Center, the machine 'nike' has this chip, and also runs Centos 7, which has gcc 4.8, which has support for the flag to enable AVX2 instructions. To test AVX2 performance, freesurfer was built with and without AVX2 support, and recon-all executed on nike. In summary, only a tiny improvement was found: about 5 minutes was saved on a 'parallelized' run, and 20 minutes on a non-parallelized run. == Test Setup == The test data is here: {{{ cd /autofs/space/nike_001/users/nicks/subjects/Haswell-AVX2-Testing setenv SUBJECTS_DIR $PWD }}} The avx2 and non-avx2 builds, created by z.kaufman, are links: {{{ /space/nike/1/users/zkaufman/freesurfer_centos7/stable_install_haswsell /space/nike/1/users/zkaufman/freesurfer_centos7/stable_install_no_haswsell }}} The haswell build included this flag in the freesurfer source build: {{{ -march=core-avx2 }}} and also in the VXL build, as VXL performs a lot of freesurfer math functions. The script 'runloop' was used to run recon-all with and without parallelization, just after nike was reboot, and during a time when nobody was running other tasks: {{{ #! /bin/tcsh foreach r (1 2 3 4) pushd stable_install_haswsell source /homes/11/nicks/bin/setfreesurferhome popd recon-all -s nick-haswell-1 -all -parallel -openmp 8 -clean pushd stable_install_no_haswsell source /homes/11/nicks/bin/setfreesurferhome popd recon-all -s nick-NOhaswell-1 -all -parallel -openmp 8 -clean pushd stable_install_haswsell source /homes/11/nicks/bin/setfreesurferhome popd recon-all -s nick-haswell-2 -all pushd stable_install_no_haswsell source /homes/11/nicks/bin/setfreesurferhome popd recon-all -s nick-NOhaswell-2 -all -clean end }}} 'grep'ing on 'recon-all-run-time' in the recon-all.log shows the completed runtime. == Results == ||run||w/o avx2||w/ avx2||%d|| ||-parallel -openmp 8||'''2.913''' hours (nick-NOhaswell-1)||'''2.888''' hours (nick-haswell-1)||0.86%|| ||-parallel -openmp 8||'''2.879''' hours (nick-NOhaswell-1)||'''2.835''' hours (nick-haswell-1)||1.53%|| ||(single cpu)||'''6.499''' hours (nick-NOhaswell-2)||'''6.181''' hours (nick-haswell-2)||4.89%|| These were run to determine if avx2 changes results: {{{ asegstatsdiff nick-haswell-1 nick-NOhaswell-1 asegstatsdiff nick-haswell-2 nick-NOhaswell-2 aparcstatsdiff nick-haswell-1 nick-NOhaswell-1 lh aparc thickness aparcstatsdiff nick-haswell-2 nick-NOhaswell-2 lh aparc thickness }}} It was found that results DO differ. eg. l hippo by -1.36%, r hippo by 0.93%, l ento by -1.07%, r ento by 3.58% (!?) These differences were identical between parallized and non-parallelized run, confirming that -openmp does not change results (also confirmed by comparing nick-NOhaswell-1 and nick-NOhaswell-2). == Conclusion == It does not appear worthwhile to provide a haswell avx2 optimized build to the public, given the maintenance overhead and the minimal performance increase. A builder can build their own avx2 enabled build though by including these flags with configure on a centos 7 system: {{{ --with-avx2 --with-vxl-dir=/usr/pubsw/packages/1.14.0_centos7_build }}} Note: running avx2-enabled binaries on a non-haswell processor will cause the binary to core dump.