|
Size: 1558
Comment:
|
Size: 1590
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| {{attachment:/homes/4/fischl/papers/neuron.response_to_makris/cor_162_with_surfaces.tif}} | {{attachment:/homes/4/fischl/papers/neuron.response_to_makris/cor_Figure7_162.tif}}{{attachment:/homes/4/fischl/papers/neuron.response_to_makris/cor_162_with_surfaces.tif}} |
| Line 8: | Line 8: |
| Bottom: comparison of current FreeSurfer automated surface (green) with those shown by Makris (blue) et al. in Figure 7, which was apparently the worst slice in the study | Bottom: comparison of current FreeSurfer automated surface (green) with those shown by Makris (blue) et al. in Figure 7 |
Figures for the response to the Makris et al. article in Neuron 2007
Figure 1. Comparison of current FreeSurfer results to those in Makris et al.
Top: skull-stripped intensity image with no surfaces.
Bottom: comparison of current FreeSurfer automated surface (green) with those shown by Makris (blue) et al. in Figure 7
Figure 2. The 26 subjects from the supplemental data section reprocessed with no manual intervention
and no selection of the slice (the central slice in each dataset)