Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 31: | Line 31: |
===Unpacking=== nmrenv setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /space/tango/5/users/cherif/reasoning findsession <subjID> |
=== Unpacking === nmrenv [[BR]] setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /space/tango/5/users/cherif/reasoning [[BR]] findsession <subjID> [[BR]] |
Line 36: | Line 36: |
unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <> -scanonly file | unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <> -scanonly file [[BR]] |
Line 40: | Line 40: |
unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <subjdir> -run <#> 3danat cor blah | unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <subjdir> -run <#> 3danat cor blah (for the structural) [[BR]] |
'''THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS AND LIKELY HAS MISTAKES. PLEASE IGNORE FOR NOW'''
FS-FAST USE CASE 1: fMRI Sorkflow for Reasoning Study
Experiment design
The experiment consists of 3 active conditions (+baseline), referred to as V, T and P.BR The task consists in solving visually presented problems in each of these conditions. Subjects respond using a button box.BR The paradigm is presented in 6 consecutive runs, each lasting 300s. In each run, two of the three conditions are shown to minimize subject confusion, and increase statistical power**WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS ON POWER OF SHOWING ONLY A SUBSET OF THE CONDITIONS IN EACH RUN??. The runs consist of BR Run 1: T-P BR Run 2: T-V BR Run 3: P-V BR Run 4: T-P BR Run 5: T-V BR Run 6: P-V BR This alternation allows for similar scanner drift effects across the different pairings of the conditions (i.e. tentatively the same amount of drift occurs between runs 1 and 4 and 2 and 5, assuming drift is linear). Within each run, the plates are presented using a pseudo-randomized (order the same for all subjects, but only known to the experimenter) event-related paradigm. Each plate presentation is considered an event, which can last between 1 and 10s, as the plate disappears when the subject responds or times out after 10 seconds (at which point the paradigm goes on by itself). In-between plates, a fixation cross is shown with a random ISI ranging from 1500 to 3500ms in 250ms steps. Every 6 plates, the fixation cross is held for a longer time, in order to match the total run duration across subjects**IS THIS NECESSARY? WHY? IS THERE A BETTER WAY TO GO ABOUT IT THAN MY 'catchup times'?. Thus, the 7th plate appears at t=75s, the 13th at t=150s and the 19th at t=225s. The total run time of 5minutes is therefore the same as if all plates timed out (10x24 + 2.5x24 = 300). BR The PAR files look like this: BR
Init_time |
condition_nb |
duration |
condition_name |
0 |
0 |
2.5178 |
baseline |
2.5178 |
2 |
2.3427 |
perceptual |
4.8605 |
0 |
3.2763 |
baseline |
8.1368 |
3 |
2.1638 |
verbal |
10.3006 |
0 |
2.5216 |
baseline |
12.8222 |
2 |
2.5746 |
perceptual |
15.3968 |
0 |
2.0273 |
baseline |
Unpacking
nmrenv BR setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /space/tango/5/users/cherif/reasoning BR findsession <subjID> BR
unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <> -scanonly file BR unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <subjdir> -fsfast -run <#> bold bshort f
- -run . (for all 6 runs)
unpacksdcmdir src <> -targ <subjdir> -run <#> 3danat cor blah (for the structural) BR